At the end of October, the Bundeswehr said it counted 181,383 soldiers in its ranks — that’s still some distance from the target of 203,000 that the German military hopes to reach by 2025. This has given rise to concern in times of Russia’s war against Ukraine, which has once again reminded Germans how quickly conflicts can erupt in Europe.

Since taking office at the beginning of 2023, Defense Minister Boris Pistorius has been thinking about ways to make the Bundeswehr more attractive as a career. He said he has received 65 concrete proposals from his ministry on recruitment and reforming training methods.

  • Hubi
    link
    fedilink
    English
    99 months ago

    Nah, Germany has had compulsory military service before and this was never a thing here.

      • no banana
        link
        fedilink
        English
        39 months ago

        Compulsory military service and conscription are the same thing in this context.

          • @avater@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            1
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            you know that those people will not get send to the frontlines outside of germany, right? If drafted, conscripts only would be deployed on national territory and only if germany would be under attack.

          • @Relo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            19 months ago

            When rich kids fight next to poor kids you will have politicians think twice before they start a war.

            • @rockSlayer@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              -1
              edit-2
              9 months ago

              compulsory military service isn’t a good thing though. That’s like saying the romans went to war less because the Praetors were cavalry.

              cautionary edit: I’m not going to get into historical debates about Romans. The Praetors were primarily from the Equestrian class, and in the early republic were cavalry because they had the money to maintain war horses.

              • @Windex007@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                19 months ago

                It’s a pretty cost effective alternative to maintaining an excessively large standing force.

                If everyone gets 12-18 months of training, it allows the nation the capacity to mobilize quickly “on-demand”, instead of that capacity being “always on”.

                I imagine there are other periphery societal benefits. Having a shared experience, even if it is military service, can be good for cultural unity.

                Not saying they should or shouldn’t, btw. Just saying it might be more pragmatic than the alternatives.

                • @rockSlayer@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  19 months ago

                  I have a strong family history of military service, with a verifiable family history going back to the US revolution. I get where the idea comes from. There was a point where I supported compulsory military service too, However, it ultimately serves the capitalist class, who are perfectly content to throw their own children to the war machine to ensure that the next quarter is profitable. Conscription certainly serves the purpose of filling out the ranks, but ultimately it’s a reason to kill people for the imperialist purposes of ensuring an unequal standard of living between the imperial core (in this case the EU) and the imperial periphery.